Dance, perfection & freedom 

Written by Lena Pietrzak.

Photograph of Mikhail Baryshnikov and Linda Dowdell by Annie Leibovitz, White Oak Plantation, Florida, 1990.

A photograph by Annie Leibovitz captures ballet dancer Mikhail Baryshnikov and musician Linda Dowdell at the White Oak Plantation, Florida (1990). Rendered in grayscale, the image emphasizes the raw simplicity of black and white: unvarnished, honest, strikingly human. The setting of choice juxtaposes the controlled, artificial environment of the studio with the organic, untamed nature of the surrounding trees. The trees, rooted and immovable, oppose the dynamism of the human subjects: the tension between freedom and restraint. 

For Baryshnikov, this tension is deeply personal. His discipline began in the Soviet Union, a regime synonymous with control and suppression. When Baryshnikov defected to America in 1974, it was far more than a physical escape, it was a reclamation of his autonomy. In the Soviet context, art was propaganda. Individuality was stripped away, and artists were molded to serve the state. Like in George Orwell’s 1984, creativity was reduced to state-sanctioned expressions of power. Ballet companies toured the world as symbols of the might of the Soviet regime: “Look at us, powerful Russia, look what we can do!” Yet Baryshnikov’s artistry could not be confined. 

In the photograph, Baryshnikov stands atop a grand piano in a perfect arabesque, an iconic symbol of classical ballet, he defies gravity and convention. The piano, an instrument of precision and harmony, becomes a pedestal for rebellion. This moment captures more than technical mastery: it embodies his anger, frustration, and yearning for liberation. Baryshnikov’s artistry rejects the rigidity of the regime that sought to define him. An artist must be free, not bound by external constraints. 

Linda Dowdell, seated at the piano, is an enigma: detached, seemingly unaware of the dancer above her. At that time, she was the musical director of Mikhail Baryshnikov’s White Oak Dance Project. Her hands, bound to the keys, perform with mechanical precision, yet her posture exudes a quiet resignation. Dowdell embodies the sensitivity stripped away by rigorous classical training, whether in music or dance, highlighting the mental toll that artistic discipline takes.  

Leibovitz’s photograph celebrates the artistry of its figures but also their humanity, revealing the raw essence of art itself: a negotiation between constraint and liberation. 

Art, by definition, implies freedom. Yet for dancers, this freedom is paradoxical. Ballet demands absolute adherence to technical precision defined by centuries-old rules. The delicate interplay between constraint and artistic liberty defines the craft. A pirouette, for example, involves angular momentum, the rotational equivalent of linear momentum, where rotational inertia depends on the mass and its distribution relative to the axis of rotation. Even while bound by the immutable laws of physics, a dancer must perform the movement with unique artistry. 

 Ballet demands more than physical skill, it requires relentless mental conditioning. The pursuit of perfection in dance is not a destination but a rather Sisyphean task: endless, laborious, and ultimately futile. The closer a dancer comes to perfection, the further it seems to be. It is a cycle of constant striving, where the body becomes a machine programmed to execute movements that defy physics, and the mind becomes enslaved to the ideal of flawlessness. 

 As a young dancer, I was conditioned to view my worth through critique. The voice of my Russian teacher, Mr. Konstantin, still brings me shivers. His violent tone and relentless corrections brought tears as a prepubescent child, but the rare moments of praise, Maladiec (“good job"), felt distant and unreachable. I cannot pinpoint the moment where the frivolity of tutus and pink slippers turned into fear of ballet class.

By adolescence, I was no longer a dancer but a collection of flaws to be corrected. Even applause felt undeserved: a hollow reward for an imperfect performance. 

Next
Next

Piet Mondrian: Abstract foundations.